AM Daytimers Need to Begin Service Earlier, Some Say
     
print  rss 


Some AM broadcasters agree that daytimers should be allowed to begin pre-sunrise service earlier, to be more competitive in their markets during morning drive.

Their comments were filed with the Federal Communications Commission on Richard Arsenault's proposal to allow AM daytimers on regional channels to begin pre-sunrise service earlier (RM# 11599).

Four broadcasters filed comments on the petition; all support the concept and most believe it should be expanded to include all AM daytimers. No one opposed the concept, and no non-station comments were filed.

Arsenault, who describes himself as an acquisitions and technologies consultant, said in his proposal that AM daytimers are at a competitive disadvantage during morning drive, which typically begins at 5 to 5:30 a.m. in most areas. Those AM signals are unlistenable at that time and most listeners won't try to tune in an AM still operating with its nighttime signal, he argues. That's why the New Jersey-based consultant proposed that the FCC allow Class D and Class B stations operating on regional channels to begin operations at 5 a.m. — rather than the current 6 a.m. — under PSR authority with up to 500 watts. He believes up to 2,063 Class Ds and Bs could benefit.

Much has been said in Radio World and elsewhere about the need to give AM stations regulatory relief, and it's rather surprising that this proposal attracted only four comments, with none from smaller radio groups or from the NAB. Maybe other small-station owners feel that this proposal isn't a big deal, or that the problem isn't as big as Arsenault thinks it is. The number of comments might suggest it's not a burning priority, even for those who often say that AM needs regulatory relief.

Bustos Media told the FCC the scope of the change should be widened beyond AM daytimers operating on regional channels, to apply to all AM daytimers. Bustos pointed out, for example, that "the need for an early morning start for many commuters has caused prominent local radio stations in the Washington-Baltimore area to start weekday morning radio programs at 5 a.m., rather than at the traditional 6 a.m."

It cites a 5 a.m. start for the morning shows of WMAL(AM), 630 kHz, Washington, and WBAL(AM), 1090 kHz, Baltimore. AM daytimers that sign on at 6 a.m. or later "cannot effectively compete with their full-time AM counterparts who start live local programming at 5 a.m.," Bustos wrote.

Bustos is the licensee of three AMs on clear channel frequencies: KZSJ(AM), 1120 kHz, San Martin, Calif. (San Jose radio market); KREH(AM), 900 kHz, Pecan Grove, Texas (Houston market); and KTXV, 890 kHz, Mabank, Texas (Dallas-Fort Worth). Radio consumers today "are far less reliant on clear-channel stations that required 'non-dominant' co-channel stations to sign off at sunset and remain silent until local sunrise," the company stated in its remarks. "There is no real reason to discriminate between AM daytimers on 'regional channels' and AM daytimers on 'clear channels.'"

K.W. Dolmar Broadcasting and Blount — that's one company — also thinks the concept should be extended to all AM daytimers.

The broadcaster is the licensee of WFIF(AM), operating at 1500 KHz in Milford, Conn., and WVNE(AM), operating at 760 KHz in Leicester, Mass. Both stations operate on clear-channel frequency assignments and sign on at 7:15 a.m. in the winter, "too late to alert parents to school closings or travel delays," writes the broadcaster. Because of the delay in sign-on, neither station can fully serve its community, it says.

Quinnipiac University, licensee of Class B standard WQUN(AM), Hamden, Conn., operates with 1 kW during daytime hours and 305 watts at night. "The station's morning show has generated very strong audience ratings from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. but has suffered during the first hour of broadcast due to the poor quality of the signal prior to the 6 a.m. PRSA operation," it writes.

And finally, Tuscarawas Broadcasting, licensee of WBTC(AM), Uhrichsville, Ohio. is authorized for 250 watts day and 5 watts at night; it too supports the proposal. "Those who listen in their cars may not even have a preset button for a station that is not on the air at 5 a.m., and not having a dedicated preset button is the death knell for AMs in particular," according to the station.

print  rss 

Rating People: 0   Average Rating:     
Comment List:

Nice editor software. It removes all vertical spacing and paragraph formatting. :P
By Willie on 4/29/2010
1'st, a quick comment to the Editor: That should be 1500 kHz and 760 kHz, not MHz. I used to work for WFIF, from 1987 to 2007. All 20 of those years, I heard from listeners who "missed us" in winter. I wanted to see some kind of action from the FCC to allow the station to serve its morning listeners in winter (when it's most needed) as well as in summer. The coastline of CT couldn't care less about traffic reports on the DC Beltway, as aired by the station on 1500 in DC! (What are it's call letters du jour?) One caveat: WFIF would need to operate at full power to be heard over the powerful skywave from the DC 1500 station. I live only about 10 miles from WFIF, and receive their full power signal with 7mv/m at my house. I have observed the DC station's signal peak as high as 20mv on some winter nights! Since WFIF's antenna is directional, and their null toward DC is VERY deep, WFIF would cause MINIMAL interference to the DC area, while still experiencing a significant amount from it. This was confirmed one night when I was doing some transmitter remote control testing after midnight. A gentleman in the Maryland area was picking up the DC 1500 with a good, mostly steady signal. WFIF's full power signal (which consisted of tones and Morse Code ID) was *barely discernable* when it peaked. A similar test, conducted while WFIF was operating non-directionally at 1/4 power, due to ongoing tower work, yielded a considerably stronger signal to that area (understandably). I would love to see directional Daytimers, like WFIF, granted a year 'round 5am sign-on and 6pm sign-off in winter.
By Willie on 4/29/2010
This is the first time I heard about the matter. Perhaps I missed it in my regular check of the Daily Digest FCC communications. I would have surely contributed my thoughts. Basically stated, since there are no regions of the United States which lack more localized radio coverage, the stated reason for "regional stations" longer exists. Let them keep their power, but stop protecting their huge coverage area. Our Post-Sunset Authorizations are barely worth using, and because of changes related to Daylight Savings Time, our original Pre-Sunrise Authorization for April has been recalculated and greatly diminished by the Commission. Hopefully they have abandoned the recalculation project that was retracted some time back for problems with the computer program. More common sense is in order.
By N. M. Wilson on 4/29/2010
More noise. More expense. Listener perception of the station will go down the toilet... Time to move the stations to a new VHF DRM digital band. Lower Power. Better Coverage. VHF Digital.
By James Johnson on 4/29/2010
The "d/new & not inmproved" FCC ECFS will not allow you to view or to comment on this filing, that's why most of us could not add our comments! This filing does not exist if you do a search using ECFS.
By Anonymous on 4/29/2010

Post your comment

Your Name: Required
Your Mail:    Email is used only to display Gravatar
Your Site:   
Comment Info:         

Posts are reviewed before publication, typically the next business morning. Radio World encourages multiple viewpoints, though a post will be blocked if it contains abusive language, or is repetitive or spam. Thank you for commenting!